Muzaffarnagar fight between hindu and muslim dating

Hindu-Muslim marriages are the new poll weapon in Muzaffarnagar | Daily Mail Online

4 Years After Muzaffarnagar Riots, Hindu-Muslim Couple's Birthday Tragedy. Naseem was thrown off his motorcycle, beaten with sticks and. A series of riots that claims the lives of about 40 people (60% Muslim, 40% Hindu , according to a police source) may appear insignificant. Ten fatalities were reported on Sunday when Muslim and Hindu communities clashed in the town of Muzaffarnagar. 4 Online Dating Sites that Actually Work for FreeTop US Dating Sites and at the same time find a way of blaming the beleaguered Muslim minority for this clash – ultimately venting their.

These members - 43 in the case of Muzaffarnagar - will elect one chairperson in each of the odd districts of the state to carry out development works in rural areas.

In the narrow lanes of Purkaji, 25 km from the main city, year-old Chhoti Devi is campaigning in ward No. While she talks about the poor and the need to build toilets for them, her family seeks votes for her.

And so do brick supplier Amir Ali 50who married her inand his family members. A fragile peace holds sway in the whole of western UP following a spurt in clashes over issues like cow slaughter and religious conversion - linked by some to the installation of a BJP-led government at the Centre.

One of the posters featuring a Hindu- Muslim couple ahead of zila panchayat polls in Muzaffarnagar. The first phase of polls will be held on Friday.

4 Years After Muzaffarnagar Riots, Hindu-Muslim Couple's Birthday Tragedy

Aman kaayam kare mein ye ek alag nazeer banegi. Eight of the 43 seats are reserved for SC women, where a Muslim cannot contest. All three key players - the ruling Samajwadi Party, BJP and BSP - are taking these polls seriously, hoping that positive results will enthuse their cadres to go all out for the all-important Assembly elections in How did they get married?

Her husband chips in. Around 2, Jats returning from the Mahapanchayat held at Kawwal were ambushed by a Muslim [24] mob armed with assault rifles and other sophisticated weapons near Jauli Canal on 7 September. According to an eyewitness account, the bodies were dumped into the canal. Even with the curfew and use of army the clashes continued for the next three days, with casualties increasing to 43 by 12 September A state home department official said that 38 people died in Muzaffarnagar, 3 in Baghpat, and one each in Saharanpur and Meerut.

Sexual violence[ edit ] The first case of gang-rape was registered in the aftermath of the riots from the village of Fugana in Jogiya Kheda. The crowd became violent when the police began to brandish sticks. The situation turned tense when a rumour spread that a youth injured in police action had died. Crowd set fire police jeeps and other vehicles. Police forces were deployed and an alert was sounded in the entire district. The incident is widely seen as repercussion of the violence in September.

They cancelled 2, arms licenses, seized 2, arms, and filed seven cases under the National Security Act. The commission has been asked to submit a report about the violence within two months.

He was absconding but surrendered on 17 December and was sent to judicial custody. The dispute arose instead from an accident of the motor-cycles belonging to the Muslim and Jat youth. Angry Muslim neighbours caught and killed the two Jat youth.

Hindu woman 'gang raped and forced to convert to Islam' - Telegraph

The report also accepts that the video of the two youths being killed by a mob was of a lynching in Pakistan, and that it was mischievously circulated widely with posts including from MLA Som claiming that the youths being lynched mercilessly were the Jat brothers. This inflamed communal tempers feverishly among the Jats against the Muslims.

It also accepts that false rumours were deliberately circulated before the maha-panchayat of September 7,that hundreds of Jats had been slaughtered by Muslims and thrown into a canal, that communally provocative speeches were made in the maha-panchayat, and that the widespread arson and slaughter of Muslims started after this. This should have established clearly the culpability of the BJP and Hindutva organisations for raising communal tempers with criminally circulated falsehoods against the local Muslims, and the communally charged speeches.

Instead the commission chooses to give equal, actually greater weightage, to the version of the Hindu Jat majority. Read Muzaffarnagar riots probe finds no lapse by UP govt, blames police The judge accepts without evidence the charge that while Shahnawaz did not know or tease the sister of the Jat brothers, tensions were high because Muslim youth in general did tease Jat girls.

Hindu-Muslim marriages are the new poll weapon in Muzaffarnagar

He also accepts again admittedly without evidence that Muslim leaders made communally provocative speeches, and also provoked Jat anger by attacking them as they gathered in large numbers for the September 7 maha-panchayat, and also after they dispersed. He ignores completely official and fact-finding reports that the Jat mobs were raising threatening slogans asking Muslims to go to Pakistan or the cemetery and attacking them in large numbers, and the few acts of violence by Muslims had to be seen in that perspective.

  • Hindu woman 'gang raped and forced to convert to Islam'
  • Muzaffarnagar riots: Judicial panel fails to hold up the light to truth
  • Muzaffarnagar tense over conversion of Muslim woman

In this way, the commission mostly accepts and reproduces the Jat and Hindutva narrative of what caused the Muzaffarnagar massacre. In general, apologists for communal violence by Hindus always build up a similar narrative, that Hindus by nature are peace-loving. It is Muslims who create trouble by harassing Hindu girls, making communally provocative speeches, and unprovoked acts of aggression. Hindu violence against Muslims is always retaliatory and defensive acts, against pervasive Muslim aggression.

The Sahai commission succeeds in endorsing precisely this majoritarian rationalisation of Hindu violence against Muslims in Muzaffarnagar.