The problems with Carbon Dating | A Christian's Spiritual Journey 一個基督徒的屬靈旅程
reasons why you cant trust carbon dating creationist creationism evolution lived millions of years ago (instead of thousands of years ago like the bible says). A great book on the flaws of dating methods is "Radioisotopes and the age of the. Evolutionists have long used the carbon, or radiocarbon, dating technique that the radiocarbon method has soundly refuted the Bible's historical accuracy. So, carbon dating is explained using the theoretical and practical knowledge that I struggle with what the Bible says as far as dates, the age of the earth, etc. .. in the face of evidence that carbon dating is seriously flawed, but they treat me.
However, evidence indicates that the opposite is true. Experiments have been performed using the radioactive isotopes of uranium and iron, and have shown that rates can and do vary.
In fact, changing the environments surrounding the samples can alter decay rates. The second faulty assumption is that the rate of carbon formation has remained constant over the years. There are a few reasons to believe this assumption is erroneous. The industrial revolution greatly increased the amount of carbon released into the atmosphere through the burning of coal. Also, the atomic bomb testing around caused a rise in neutrons, which increased carbon concentrations.
This would decrease the release of carbon to the atmosphere through the decay of vegetation. Third, for carbon dating to be accurate, the concentrations of carbon and carbon must have remained constant in the atmosphere. In addition to the reasons mentioned in the previous paragraph, the flood provides another evidence that this is a faulty assumption.
During the flood, subterranean water chambers that were under great pressure would have been breached. This would have resulted in an enormous amount of carbon being released into the oceans and atmosphere. The effect would be not unlike opening a can of soda and having the carbon dioxide fizzing out. The water in these subterranean chambers would not have contained carbon, as the water was shielded from cosmic radiation. This would have upset the ratio of carbon to carbon To make carbon dating work, Dr.
Libby also assumed that the amount of carbon being presently produced had equaled the amount of carbon — he assumed that they had reached a balance. The formation of carbon increases with time, and at the time of creation was probably at or near zero.
If you start with no carbon in the atmosphere, it would take over 50, years for the amount being produced to reach equilibrium with the amount decaying.
Carbon Dating Flaws – Doesn’t Carbon Dating Disprove the Bible?
One of the reasons we know that the earth is less than 50, years old is because of the biblical record. Libby and the evolutionist crowd have assumed that all plant and animal life utilize carbon equally as they do carbon Live mollusks off the Hawaiian coast have had their shells dated with the carbon method. These test showed that the shells died years ago!
- Revising Radiocarbon Dating
- The fatal flaw with radioactive dating methods
- Carbon-14 Dating Does Not Disprove the Bible
This news came as quite a shock to the mollusks that had been using those shells until just recently. The list of non-compliant dates from this method is endless. Most evolutionists today would conclude that carbon dating is — at best — reliable for only the last to years. There is another reason that carbon dating has yielded questionable results — human bias.
In a blind study, using carbon dating for example, a person would send in a few quality control samples along with the actual sample to the laboratory. The laboratory analyst should not know which sample is the one of interest.
In this way, the analyst could not introduce bias into the dating of the actual sample. In a double-blind study using an experimental drug study as an examplesome patients will be given the experimental drug, while others will be given a placebo a harmless sugar pill.
Neither the patients nor the doctors while know who gets what. This provides an added layer of protection against bias. Radiocarbon dates that do not fit a desired theory are often excluded by alleging cross-contamination of the sample. In this manner, an evolutionist can present a sample for analysis, and tell the laboratory that he assumes the sample to be somewhere between 50, years old andyears old.
Dates that do not conform to this estimate are thrown out.
The truth found there transformed my life from one of confusion, selfishness, and uncertainty to one of peace, purpose and understanding. When I realized that Jesus died on a cross because of people like me or more specifically for me, I chose in that moment to surrender my life to Him.
From that moment I was filled with peace in knowing that regardless of where the path would lead, as long as God was in control, it mattered very little which direction it took. Only that if God was leading it would be right and good. Well, 24 years later I can say that has been true and so has the Bible.
Yes, believing in a young earth sometimes takes faith but not near as much faith as it takes to believe in evolution. I think one has to work hard to believe that the intelligent design behind even the simplest organism is due to random formations of the elements around us. Since I have a personal and intimate relationship with the One who gave me new life, and since His Word the Bible has proven itself true over and over in spiritual things, I feel the other facts found there pertaining to creation etc.
My prayer for them is that the God of all creation will have mercy on them and open their eyes to the glorious truth revealed in Jesus Chist, that they might find peace and eternal life with the One who is love.
Carbon Dating Does Not Disprove the Bible
November 27, Glauron got me right. Their admissions of no eyewitnesses are enough to lead one to presume that these stories have been embellished. The Torah is the Hebrew name for the five Books of Moses. If the texts were embellished then you would think that they would have whitewashed their heroes.
December 31, Adam was there. He could have easily recorded the events after he was created.Creation v. Evolution: How Carbon Dating Works
And we know from the biblical record that he personally talked with God. He is only six days out from the original creation. Light March 8, ALL recorded history goes back only a little over years which is also the age of man according to the Bible — there is no older written history.
Revising Radiocarbon Dating
Earthquakes in one place after another were all predicted and if you study the statistics for earthquakes you will find that they have increased exponentially starting with There are many more prophesies that are coming true NOW. Read Matthew chapter 14 and Like chapter 21 to see the change in conditions predicted for the time we live in and 2 Timothy Chapter 3 for the predictions of the increasing bad attitudes of PEOPLE in this time. If you found a very primitive little hut made of sticks constructed in the middle of what you thought was an uninhabited island you would conclude that some intelligent being had constructed it — you would NOT ever think that the sticks came together and were tied together with vines to form a roof and walls by coincidence from the wind!
And you that chose to believe this consider yourselves somehow superior in intelligence compared to those that believe in an intelligent creator? Can't Stop Believing March 16, When you throw in all of the recent scandals of climate-gate, one has to really question the integrity of the scientific community.
HG April 3, Radiocarbon Dating is used on organic objects only, so the fact that your whole example is based on inorganic rocks and radio carbon dating only suggests that you do not know with any detail or understanding the topic that you are discussing. Your arguments have no research, you have a biased opinion because of your faith, and are not willing to look at the truth, only your version of it.
Yes radiocarbon dating is not infallible, but dendrochronology is extremely reliable and dates back 8,yrs in the Southwest and in Europe it has been used up to 10,yrs.